مسكن
>
supreme court judgement on stone crushers
منتج
أكثر من 30 نوعًا من المنتجات تغطي التعدين وسحق البناء والطحن الصناعي ومواد البناء الخضراء وغيرها من المجالات
supreme court judgement on stone crushers
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 218
20211118 November, 2013 by the Principal of the Government Inter. College, Moti Nagar alleging that due to the stone. crushers operations, teaching is affected and the health. of the students and teachers of the college are. compromised. A like complaint 1992515 No stone crusher shall operate in the above said area form August 15, 1992 onward. (3) The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of IndiaOrs Judgments Supreme Court1992630 ON MAY 15 this year, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgement in response to a public interest suit demanding the closure of the 300-odd stone-crushing Closure of stone crushers leaves labour high and dry Down
get price
State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15
All the writ petitioners supported the judgment of Uttarakhand High Court dated 01.07.2004 in M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher wherein, the High Court has held that no levy of Transit 20091216 The observation of the Supreme Court cannot be termed to be 'obiter dicta' since the Supreme Court has held that the process of concrete by stone crushers is M/S. D.J Stone Crusher v. Commissioner Of Income Tax2022228 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1697 OF 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 15082/2021) M/S M/S MAHAGANAPATHI STONE CRUSHERS v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Supreme
get price
State Of Himachal PradeshOrs vs Bhag SinghOthers on
Thus, the stone crushers set up within 100 meters of a water body will be illegal and in violation of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the Notification issued thereunder." 4. Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S DIAMOND STONE CRUSHERS v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR on CaseMine.M/S DIAMOND STONE CRUSHERS v. UNION TERRITORY OF 2022228 Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S MAHAGANAPATHI STONE CRUSHERS v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on CaseMine.M/S MAHAGANAPATHI STONE CRUSHERS v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Supreme
get price
State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15
We thus are of the view that judgment of Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court dated 27.04.2005 in Kumar Stone Works deserved to be approved and judgment of Uttarakhand dated 01.07.2004 in Kumaon Stone Crusher deserves to be set aside in so far as above aspect is concerned.In absence of any unimpeachable scientific material placed on record by the State of Himachal Pradesh or the stone crushers in pursuance of order of Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 15.03.2019 though a period of more than three months has gone, after hearing learned Advocate General for the State and for the stone crushers, we are unable to State Of Himachal PradeshOrs vs Bhag SinghOthers on 2021531 The petitioner has been also granted a licence under Section 3 of the Karnataka Regulation of Stone Crushers Act, 2011 (for short 'the said Act of 2011') for carrying out crushing activities which is valid up to 20th February 2035. 3. By the impugned order at Annexure-L dated 30th July 2019, the petitioner has been called upon to stop theABHISHEK STONE CRUSHER v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Karnataka High Court
get price
M/S SLV STONE CRYSTALS v. STATE OF KARNATAKA Karnataka High Court
20181123 He submits that the subject matter of this petition is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Sri Saiyed Jiyaulla and others v. State of Karnataka and another (Crl.P.No.4250/2018 decided on 28.06.2018). 2. The submissions of learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner are not disputed by learned High Court Government Pleader. 3.2023317 M/S.Ayyappa Stone Crushers vs State Of Telangana And 4 Others 2023 Latest Caselaw 1310 Tel Citation : 2023 Latest debris are being dumped in about Acs.4.00 guntas of forest land which is in violation of directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India inM/S.Ayyappa Stone Crushers vs State Of Telangana And 4202388 the offices of sone crushers and mining lease holders established in the area due to unemployment. In this way, thousands of people earn their livelihood by working in mining offices and stone crushers at the local level. Taking advantage of the unemployment and helplessness of the applicant, Mohammad WajidJ U D G M E N T J.B. PARDIWALA, J. SUPREME COURT
get price
stone crusher supreme court judgment
stone crusher supreme court judgment chlefortbe. 20 Jul 2020 Behat, District Saharanpur UP, M/s Neelkanth Stone Crusher Also Supreme court order dated 03 May 2019 4 The decision has already been taken in 470th SEAC meeting dated 20041123 C.S. Rawat, J. 1. This petition has been filed for quashing the condition/restriction placed in the notification dated February 16, 2004 issued under Section 3-A(1) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") which provides for levy of tax on stone grit/gitti at the point of sale by the stone crushers to the Himalaya Stone Industry And Ors. v. State Of Uttaranchal A progress report in this respect should be sent to the Registry of this Court before July 31, 1992. [360 B-C, E-H, 361 A-G] 3. Some Writ Petitions, which were filled by the owners/proprietors of stone-crushers in the Delhi High Court and which have been directed to be transferred to this Court are dismissed. [360 E] JUDGMENT:M.C. Mehta Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Others Etc. Etc on
get price
M/S DIAMOND STONE CRUSHERS v. UNION TERRITORY OF
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S DIAMOND STONE CRUSHERS v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR on CaseMine.ORDER R.P. Sethi, J. 1. In pursuance to the directions given by the Supreme Court in M. C. Mehta v.Union of India (1992) 3 SCC 256, Government of Haryana issued notification dated 4-8-1992 wherein it was declared that the State Government was of the opinion that the stone crushers units in the State of Haryana have been causing grave air pollution and Ishwar Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 10 July, 19952010817 In the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by a Division Bench judgment dated 26-6-2007 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 993 of 2004(M/B) M/s Gupta Builders v.Kumaun Stone Crusher v. State Of Uttarakhand CaseMine
get price
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 218
20211118 12. On 11.12.2018, after the Supreme Court remand, the NGT passed a fresh order disposing of the O.A. No. 332/2017 whereby the onus was shifted to the State Government to assess the functioning of the stone crushers and in the event, they are found violating any of the environmental norms, steps were to be taken for closure of the 2019720 In a historic case, 212 stone crushers were shifted out of Delhi to a ‘Crushing Zone’ set up in Haryana by an order of the Supreme Court on May 15th, 1992. Emission of more than 1500 tons of dust emitted daily in the atmosphere has been eliminated. This matter was taken up in the Supreme Court and vide an historic Landmark Judgments M. C. Mehta Environmental Foundation
get price